“Romish” Revivalism: Methodism, the New Measures, and Evangelical Popery in Antebellum America
PDF (Full Text)

Keywords

Anti-revivalism
Anti-Catholicism
Methodism
New Measures
John W. Nevin

How to Cite

Denton, A. (2013). “Romish” Revivalism: Methodism, the New Measures, and Evangelical Popery in Antebellum America. Methodist Review, 5, 53–70. Retrieved from https://methodistreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/89

Abstract

Opponents of revival-style evangelism in antebellum America commonly drew comparisons between revivalists and “papists.” While allegations of “popery” were issued quite promiscuously during this era, anti-revival Protestants such as John Williamson Nevin employed such rhetoric in a more than casually provocative manner, seeking to demonstrate a true resemblance between the purported deficiencies of Roman Catholicism and the modes of religious awakening promoted by Methodists and “new measures men” like Charles Finney, among others. This essay looks briefly at transatlantic eighteenth-century precedents for associating “enthusiasts” with “papists.” It then examines the manner in which nineteenth-century critics in the United States maintained this association, finding Methodists and other revivalists to be suspiciously “popish” in the irrationality of their piety, the ceremonialism of their worship, the Pelagian bent of their theology, and the authoritarian structure of their church and charitable organizations.

PDF (Full Text)

Authors who publish with Methodist Review agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright ownership and all intellectual property rights to their work, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal but prohibits modification or commercial use of the work without the permission of the author.

  • Authors are free to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), in whole or in part, on the condition that its initial publication in this journal is clearly acknowledged.

  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.